Indian Army Structural Survey Consultancy for AF Station Chandigarh 2026 - E-in-C Enlistment, Govt MoU, ESI/PF

Tender Overview

Organization: Indian Army, Department of Military Affairs. Service: consultancy services for structural survey/soundness of buildings at AF Station Chandigarh. Estimated value: ₹1,640,000 with EMD ₹32,800. Location: CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH - 160001. Key differentiator: mandatory enlistment with E-in-C's Branch or CE Zone and MoU with a govt technical institute. The scope targets engineering consultancy for structural assessment, risk identification, and compliance guidance for military facilities. Tender requires adherence to government procurement norms and security clearances. Unique clause allows quantity/duration adjustments up to 25% pre/post contract issuance.

Technical Specifications & Requirements

• No formal BOQ or itemized technical specs were provided.
• Mandatory prerequisites include enlistment letter with E-in-C's Branch or Command CE/CE Zone.
• Evidence of MoU with IIT/NIT/ Govt Engineering College or equivalent government technical institute.
• ESI/PF registration proof required.
• Staffing criterion: at least one BE/BTech engineer with 10 years of experience.
• Tender context implies structural survey deliverables, risk assessment, and soundness reporting for AF Station Chandigarh.
• No explicit performance standards or IS codes listed; bidders must align with standard government engineering consultancy practices.
• Labor and safety compliance, along with documentation to substantiate eligibility, are implied by the ATC terms.

Terms, Conditions & Eligibility

• EMD: ₹32,800 must be deposited with bid.
• Eligibility: enlistment proof with E-in-C's Branch / CE Branch or CE Zone, and proof of MoU with a govt technical institute.
• Security and compliance: ESI/PF registration and valid statutory documents.
• Personnel: minimum one engineer with BE/BTech and 10 years experience.
• Quantity/duration flexibility up to 25% allowed around contract issue.
• No explicit delivery timeline published; bidders should expect standard government project deadlines post-issuance.
• Payment terms, warranty, and penalties are not detailed in available data; bidders should seek ATC clarity.