India Optel Limited Sealent Tender Chandigarh 2026 TY 38.105.671-78 TechSeal Alternate Poly Sulphate

Tender Overview

• Organization: India Optel Limited, under the Department Of Defence Production in Chandigarh, 160001. Procurement for SEALANT YT-32/RDL-930 as per TY 38.105.671-78 and ALTERNATE POLY SULPHATE SEALANT TECHSEAL. No BOQ items listed; scope inferred to be sealant materials meeting the typology. Tender includes supplier obligations under flexible quantity and delivery terms with standard warranty. Estimated contract specifics not disclosed; emphasis on conformance to the specified sealant type and end-use in defence production.
• The tender emphasizes option quantities up to 25% of bid quantity during contract execution, with delivery periods recalibrated accordingly and minimum additional time of 30 days. GST handling is bidder-responsibility with reimbursement cap aligned to actuals or quoted rate. Key termination rights are defined for non-performance or delivery failure, including bankruptcy and misrepresentation.
• A nominated inspection framework exists, with post-receipt inspection at the consignee site managed by the CGM/OFCd or authorized representative. Warranty is fixed at 1 year from final acceptance or after commissioning, whichever occurs later. No start/end dates or value disclosed; procurement appears to hinge on compliance with the TY 38.105.671-78 specification and TechSeal sealant standard.
• This tender requires bidders to align with the buyer’s right to adjust quantities, ensure timely delivery, and provide proof of ability to meet defence-grade sealant standards. Submissions should reflect this compliance mindset and readiness for on-site verification.

Technical Specifications & Requirements

• Product/Category: SEALANT YT-32/RDL-930 as per specification TY 38.105.671-78; ALTERNATE POLY SULPHATE SEALANT TECHSEAL.
• Compliance expectations: No explicit performance metrics listed; emphasis on correct material type, end-use compatibility, and defence sector applicability.
• Delivery framework: Option to increase quantity up to 25%; delivery period linked to the last date of the original order with a minimum extension rule of 30 days; extension proportional to (additional quantity/original quantity) × original delivery period.
• Inspection regime: Post-receipt inspection at the consignee site by CGM/OFCd or Authorized Rep; pre-dispatch not mandated unless ATC selects it.
• Warranty: 1 year warranty from final acceptance or after completion of installation/testing, if applicable to scope.
• GST handling: Bidder bears GST implications; reimbursement as per actuals or applicable rate, whichever is lower, up to quoted GST percentage.
• Contract risk controls: Termination rights for non-compliance, delivery failure, insolvency, or misrepresentation.
• Notable absence: Explicit start date, end date, and EMD/estimated value not disclosed in available data.

Terms, Conditions & Eligibility

• EMD/ security: Not disclosed in available data; bidders should verify ATC/ATC amendments for bond or security requirements.
• Delivery timeline: Delivery period tied to original order date; extended time computed with minimum 30 days; options to extend to original duration.
• Payment terms: GST considerations noted; no explicit payment schedule provided in data; expect standard govt procurement norms.
• Warranty/after-sales: 1 year warranty from acceptance; installation and commissioning considered where scope includes such activities.
• Inspection/acceptance: Post-receipt inspection at consignee site; NA for pre-dispatch inspection unless ATC specifies otherwise.
• Termination rights: Comprehensive grounds cited including breach, inability to deliver, insolvency, misrepresentation, and creditors’ actions.
• Documentation: bidders must ensure readiness to provide compliance proofs, product certifications, and potential OEM authorizations.
• Option clause risk: Customer retains right to modify quantity by up to 25% and adjust delivery timelines accordingly.